I find it painfully appalling that some people are using the recent shooting on the campus of the University of Alabama-Huntsville to make arguments for looser gun control policies.
Details are still somewhat sketchy, but it appears that the perpetrator was a faculty member who was denied tenure. Biology professor Amy Bishop apparently brought a gun to a faculty meeting and, after learning she had been denied tenure for the second time in her career at Alabama, opened fire on her colleagues. Three people were killed and three others were wounded.
It beggars belief to hear some people arguing that the solution to incidents like this is actually more guns. According to msnbc, one student at the university said that she had requested that students with gun permits be allowed to carry their guns on campus and was turned down.
“I’m scared to go back to school,” (the student) said. “However, if they were to allow me to carry my pistol on campus, I would not be as scared…. I’m sorry that nobody in that room had a pistol to save at least one person’s life.”
To sum up, here’s the argument that the above student and others like her are making: that we need to allow more people to carry more weapons in more places. I reject outright such a monstrously irresponsible stance. Giving more people access to more guns is what makes America the gold-medal winner in First-World Gun Deaths.
And I don’t want to hear the argument that stricter gun control laws won’t stop gun violence since criminals and emotionally disturbed people like the woman who allegedly carried out yesterday’s campus shooting will always find ways to get their hands on weapons. That may very well be true, but looser gun control laws only make it more likely that those people will get their hands on weapons, while increasing the likelihood of more deaths resulting from their attacks.
Are you going to tell me that if anybody at that faculty meeting had been carrying a gun, they would have had the presence of mind to pull it out, aim it, and take a shot before Bishop opened fire?
Are you going to tell me that putting guns in the hands of young adults who are passing through some of the most emotionally tumultuous times in their lives is by any stretch of the imagination a smart idea? Drunk kids at house parties? Young romantics who have been spurned by the targets of their affections? Academically ambitious students for whom the C they just received in a class may end their dreams of becoming a lawyer or doctor?
Using shooting rampages to argue for looser gun control laws not only makes for a really bad argument, but it’s also socially irresponsible to an appalling degree.
- Breaking: University of Texas-Austin freezes staff pay, continues to offer faculty merit increases
- Ray Bradbury smacks down new media types
- “Math class is tough!” a few thoughts on a problematic metaphor for learning
- some thoughts on what’s ‘new’ about ‘new media’
- Oxford University is a lame parent wearing clothes it bought from Forever 21.